THE DIFFERENT ANSWERS ARE SEPARATED BY A LINE OF STARS





 
 Yes, that is sufficient.

 
*********************************************************************************
 It is satisfactory.
 
*********************************************************************************
 It would be better to have more notice of an adjustment.  Is this really
feasible?  
Is there a predicable method of obtaining these ahead of time?
 
*********************************************************************************
 It is sufficient
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 The present forecast time is sufficient for the functions that
are performed by the CSIR-NML.
 
  
*********************************************************************************
 The present time is sufficient.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 No, stay with the current 0.9s limit.
 
*********************************************************************************
  No, over 1 year. ( The forecast can be revised.)
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 The 6 months forecast time is fine for me, another notice 1 month ahead of
the occurence would be really nice.
 
*********************************************************************************
  Yes, 6 months is sufficient
 
*********************************************************************************
we prepare Shutle flight data using Leap Seconds well in =
advance of the actual flight.
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 It is sufficient.
 
*********************************************************************************
 6 months works well for us.  1 year would OK.
 
*********************************************************************************
 Yes, 6-months is sufficient notice.
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 Sufficient.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
If leapseconds were announced longer in advance, then an interval that
covers the vast majority of operational software revision lifetimes
would be particularly convenient, i.e. at least a decade, better 25
years, at the cost of the |UT1-UTC|. But this seems not critical, as
only few applications actually need access to TAI.
 
*********************************************************************************
6 months are enough for me. Announcements longer than 1 year in
 advance may be risky due to the unpredictable irregularities in
 the earth rotation.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
6 months is sufficient
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
I think that six months is ok.
 
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
6 months is OK, but a remainder or a warning on November would
   be nice for programming reasons.
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 Six months is OK
 
*********************************************************************************
 IT IS SUFFICIENT.
 
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
No
 
 
*********************************************************************************
YES, it is.
 
*********************************************************************************
6 months is fine for me.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
6 months is adequate.  Longer would be better, say 1 year.
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
Current system is sufficient.
 
*********************************************************************************
yes, it is sufficient however a year in advance would be better. It =
would provide a more advance timeframe for the Shuttle Flight Design =
process.
 
*********************************************************************************
Present forecast time is OK.
 
 
 
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 Yes, it is sufficient.
 
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 More notice would be nice, and if that is possible without
increasing tolerance for |UT1-UTC|, then please do give more
notice.  Something in the range of 15 to 18 months notice
would be very nice.
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 6 mos is sufficient
 
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 This is sufficient time for us to incorporate the value into our processing.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
6 Months is more than enough.
 
 
*********************************************************************************
 The present forecast time ist sufficient
 
*********************************************************************************
YES